back
see;
A*(2)=A x A
examples; 2*(2)=4, 4*(1/2)=2, (4/9)*(1/2)=2/3,
3(4/9)*(1/2)=2, k4*(1/2)=2k
//About the correlativity of energy multiplying
phenominon of Tesla Coil and Hutchison effect
//Generally, we make the tank circuit to oscillate
cosine-curved electric vibration. In use
of Tesla Coil, it isn't an exception.
//But, every tank circuit can't escape from
the impediment of consuming energy that resitance
causes. Usually, we tend to eliminate resistance
from tank circuit to reduse the loss of heat.
//I solved the differential equation which
describes the action of series LCR circuit(a
part of Tesla Coil). The answer showed that
tank circuit shows strange behavior when
resistance of tank circuit was larger than
a certain value. Under this condition, it
is expected that Tesla Coil will multiply
energy, or absorb deficient energy in the
capacitive space of capacitor.
//I think this is the cause of Hutchison effect, and be sure of reapperance of this effect
to regulate the resistance of general Tesla
Coil(with spark gap).
// I . Behavior of reconstructed TC

//fig. 1 Reconstructed Tesla Coil
//This is the plan of TC's new reguration.
Resistance R is larger than 2 (L/C)*(1/2)
, and the secondary inductor is connected
to the other resistor R' not the metallic
globe or ground. Under this condition, all
supplied energy from the battery V0 will be changed into thermal energy at each
resistors.
/ 1. " Charge C "
//First, the switch is conected to the point
of contact (1), and V0 charges the capacitor C . Electrical current
" I " carries electric charge from
V0 to C, but the electric energy is also spent
at the resistor R1.
// The capacitive voltage of C ( VC ) and the electric current " I "
can be expressed by V0, R1, C as following .
//VC= -V0+V0e*(-t/CR1)
//I =V0e*(-t/CR1) / R1
//The sum of accumulated electrostatic energy
EC(suppose infinite time) is equal to -CV0*(2) / 2.
//And the sum of electric power ER1(t ; 0~infinite) which is consumed at the
resistor R1 becomes following. Electric power WR1(= -R1I*(2) ) is the differential of ER1.

//ER1 was equal to EC. As a result, the total energy Esply which V0 supplies becomes twice as much as absolute
quantity of EC.
//Esply= -EC -ER1=CV0*(2) ........[1]
//Esply is CV0*(2) .
//2. " Discharge C "
//Next, after full-charging of C, turn the
connecting point of the switch from (1) to
(2). Capacitor C will discharge its electrostatic
energy, and another electric current I1 will flow into inductor L and resistor R.
Action of this part(tank circuit) is expressed
as following differential equations. In these equations, VL is the inducted voltage of L, and VR is the resistive voltage of R.
//VC+VL+VR=VC - LI1' - RI1=0
//I1= - CVC'
//Answers are following ( using "w"
instead of Greece "omega", "w"
is angular frequency).
//VC= -V0e*(-wt)
//VL= -CLV0w*(2)e*(-wt)
//VR=RwCV0e*(-wt)
//I1= -wCV0e*(-wt)
//w=(R/2L) +or- (R*(2)/4L*(2) - 1/CL)*(1/2)
//("w" is the answer of equation
"CLw*(2) - CRw +1 = 0 ")
//From these answers, each electric power(WC, WL, WR) and consumed(or discharged) energy(EC, EL, ER, ER') become following. But, providing that EL must be consumed at R', and EL must be equal to -ER'.
//WC=wCV0*(2)e*(-2wt)
//WL=Lw*(3)(CV0)*(2)e*(-2wt)
//WR= -R(wCV0)*(2)e*(-2wt)
//EC=CV0*(2)/2
//EL= L(wCV0)*(2)/2 (= -ER')
//ER= -Rw(CV0)*(2)/2
//Therefore, all generated thermal energy Egnrt becomes "|ER'|+|ER|+|ER1|(=|EL|+|ER|+|ER1|)".
//Egnrt=|ER'|+|ER|+|ER1|=L(wCV0)*(2)/2 + Rw(CV0)*(2)/2 + CV0*(2)/2
////////=C(CLw*(2) + CRw + 1)V0*(2)/2
////////=Rw(CV0)*(2)..........[2]
//Then, from the results of [1] and [2] , evaluate
"Egnrt - Esply". Define it as "E".
//E=Egnrt-Esply=Rw(CV0)*(2) - CV0*(2)=(CRw - 1)CV0*(2)
/////////////////////=L(wCV0)*(2)
//According to this result, if angular frequency
"w" were actual number at least,
E becomes larger than zero. When R was equal
to or larger than 2 (L/C)*(1/2), this condition will be satisfied. It means that this circuit multiplies enrgy.
E is the profit.
//Especially, when R=2 (L/C)*(1/2), w becomes (1/CL)*(1/2). Under this condition, E becomes CV0*(2), it is as much as supplied enrgy Esply.
//I named this equipment, "The Twisty
Energy Multiplier". Because this circuit
works like changing debt into profit. Essencially,
EL is the energy of debt, but secondary inductor
and R' changes its attribution from "debt"
into "profit".
//It sounds like "falsifying of account"
for me. I think it is like a certain countorie's
national bank buying its national debt. And
also, I feel it is "twisty" to
change attribution of EL from "debt" into "profit",
or rewriting its mark from "minus(-)"
into "plus(+)". So, I gave it the
name "twisty".
//3. A plan to realize continuous motion

fig 2. "The Twisty Energy Multiplier"
/////Condition ;/R=2 (L/C)*(1/2)
/////Under this condition,
/////w=(1/CL)*(1/2)
/////VC=VL= -V0e*(-wt), VR= -2VL= -2VC
/////(shown as the size and directions of each
arrows at fig.1)
/////I1= -2CV0e*(-wt)/R
//|EC|=|EL|=|ER'|=|ER1|=CV0*(2)/2, |ER|= CV0*(2)
//EC+EL+ER=0
//|EC|+|EL|+|ER|=|ER1|+|ER'|+|ER|=2CV0*(2)
//E=CV0*(2)
//Generated heat can be changed into electricity
by using steam engine or Peltier effect(or
thermocouple).
//This circuit(fig2) can "conduct"
continuously for the help of spark gap which
is used as an excellent substitute for the
switch of fig.1./When C was charged enough by the battery
V0, it opens spark gap and discharges its electrostatic
enrgy for L and R. And when spark gap was
closed for the lack of electrostatic energy
of C, battery V0 begins to charge C again. This circuit works
continuously with the repetition of alternative
these two actions.
//Frankly to say, this is nothing but a Tesla
Coil. Just I found its potential ability.
//II. Correlativity with Hutchison effect

fig.3 A plan for the purpose of reappearing
of Hutchison effect
//This is the "suspected" plan which
may be able to reappear Hutchison effect in the capacitive space of capacitor C'. On this plan, L' is a secondary inductor
which is connected to the primary inductor
L indirectly, and, a capacitor C' and a resistor
R'(basically, this is a large resistance)
is connected to L' in series.
//Conditions about this circuit are folowing(condition 1).
//R';voluntary (depends on proper charging speed of C)
//R=2 (L/C)*(1/2), R'=2 (L'/C')*(1/2)
//w=(1/CL)*(1/2)=(1/C'L')*(1/2)
//Provided that L' receives magnetic energy
of L in its entirety.
//According to this provision, energy of L'
(EL') must be equal to -EL. And under this condition, EL', ER' and EC' become following(this part(sereis L'C'R' circuit) is same
as the part of series LCR circuit).
//EL'=EL=CV0*(2)/2
//EC'=CV0*(2)/2
//ER'= -CV0*(2)
//EL'R'=EL'+ER'= -CV0*(2)/2, EL'R'+EC'=0
//Supplied energy from the primary inductor
L is only EL'. And as well as the series LCR circuit of
fig1, absolute quantity of thermal energy
ER' is twice as much as it.
//However, EL'R' is the excess of consumed thermal energy at R'. EC' must be the absorbed energy to offset the
excess of EL'R'.
//From this result, I presupposed the cause of Hutchison effect as following.
//"Under the condition 1, absorption of
deficient electrostatic energy will happen
in the capacitive space of capacitor C', and many kinds of materials which is put
in the capacitive space of C' will be melted with being absorbed its (some
kind of)energy."
//To make sure of this presupposition, I made
comparison fig3 with Dr. Hutchison's(I conjectured
as it) Tesla Coil(part of series L'C'R' circuit).

fig.4 Comparison with fig3.
//Condition of series L'C'R circuit(fig3) is
" R'=2(L'/C')*(1/2), w=(1/C'L')*(1/2)
".
//In case of this setting(fig4), metalic globe
and a certain domain of ground consists capacitor
C', and the distance between the grounded
point of L' and a certain domain of ground(colored
by faded purple) becomes large insulating
resistance R'. There is a close resemblance between these
two circuits.
//Then, what was the cause of generating strange
waveform of voltage at the primary series
LCR circuit?
//Dr. Hutchison constructed this equipment
to make an experiment of wirelss-transmitting
of electricity. Under this condition, it
is conjectured that capacitor of the primary
circuit " C " had to have large
electrostatic capacity because it is necessary
to transmit large electric power. And the
primary inductor L always has little inductance
for the purpose of transforming voltage.
//These conditions make the value of "L/C"
be little. When this value is too little,
the resistance R which exists naturally in the LC(R) series circuit tends to become larger than 2(L/C)*(1/2) against the
will of the producer.
//In consequence, it is presupposed that unexpected
waveform of voltage "VC=V0e*(-wt) ("w" is actual number)"
was generated in the primary LC(R) series
circuit, and absorption of electrostatic
energy happened at a certain place between the two secondary inductors of Tesla Coils
and their metalic globes which caused to
melt some kinds of materials.
//Apart from this phenominon(material's melting),
the cause of melted material's floating can
be presupposed as following.
//Vector of electrostatic field which is between
the metalic globe and a certain domain of
ground directs perpendicular at the middle
point of the two secondary capacitor.
//If E1( E(y+dy,t) ) and E2( E(y,t) ) has different size( |E2| > |E1| ), dE/dy( ={E(y+dy,t) -E(y,t)}/dy ) doesn't become zero.
//Electric field which alters belong time and
axis and never changes its direction lifts
dielectric substance or conductive materials.
It is known as Biefeld-Brown effect. I think
this effect is the cause of material's floting.
//I think, to set up the insulating resistance R' properly with depending
on unexpectable chance was the cause of difficulty
of reappearing this pheminon. In this sense,
so many accidental coincidence caused the
discovering of this phenominon.
//But, if "condition 1" was setted on some TC which is constructed
properly and was given enough electric energy,
it may be able to reappear Hutchison effect
in the capacitive space of its capacitor.