 | 映画原題: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban [ 映画邦題: ハリー・ポッターとアズカバンの囚人 ] |  | |  |  | |  | Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban : Hollywood Cinema Director : シネマ作品監督紹介 |
 | Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban : Hollywood Actor [CAST・CREW] : 出演ハリウッド俳優(男優・女優・声優)&ミュージシャン・アーティスト紹介 |  | Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban : 本国映画ライターによる映画の内容 with イングリッシュ : English Description of Story |  |  |  |  | Amazon.com:Some movie-loving wizards must have cast a magic spell on Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, because it's another grand slam for the Harry Potter franchise. Demonstrating remarkable versatility after the arthouse success of Y Tu Mamá También, director Alfonso Cuarón proves a perfect choice to guide Harry, Hermione, and Ron into treacherous puberty as the now 13-year-old students at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry face a new and daunting challenge: Sirius Black (Gary Oldman) has escaped from Azkaban prison, and for reasons yet unknown (unless, of course, you've read J.K. Rowling's book, considered by many to be the best in the series), he's after Harry in a bid for revenge. This dark and dangerous mystery drives the action while Harry (the fast-growing Daniel Radcliffe) and his third-year Hogwarts classmates discover the flying hippogriff Buckbeak (a marvelous CGI creature), the benevolent but enigmatic Professor Lupin (David Thewlis), horrifying black-robed Dementors, sneaky Peter Pettigrew (Timothy Spall), and the wonderful advantage of having a Time-Turner just when you need one. The familiar Hogwarts staff returns in fine form (including the delightful Michael Gambon, replacing the late Richard Harris as Dumbledore, and Emma Thompson as the goggle-eyed Sybil Trelawney), and even Julie Christie joins this prestigious production for a brief but welcome cameo. Technically dazzling, fast-paced, and chock-full of Rowling's boundless imagination (loyally adapted by ace screenwriter Steve Kloves), The Prisoner of Azkaban is a Potter-movie classic. --Jeff Shannon |  |  |  |  | | | |
 | Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban : 現地ハリウッド市民の評価 : 英語批評版 : Native Evaluation |  |  |  |  | I KNOW WHERE YOU LIVE CUARテ哲! / 2005-12-18
I ask you: why did Cuarテウn have to mess with a great book? A temperamental and brittle movie at best. A good movie, good enough for me to buy a ticket to it, good enough to buy a copy of it, but still a little jumbled. Watson and Radcliffe pull it out of the hat, while Grint moves into the sublime distance. Warner Bros. is starting to show some stretching from knocking the shuttlecock over the net too quickly when they're the only player. |  |  |  |  | | | |  |  |  |  | Amazing / 2005-12-17
I want to start off by saying this. I love the Harry Potter books. No, I take that back. I am OBSESSED with the Harry Potter books. A lot of my life revolves around the latest Harry Potter news and what is happening to Harry, Ron, Hermione, Draco, and the rest of my favorites. I think the original books are pieces of literature and that JK Rowling is one of the greatest writers of our generation. I know half the books by heart. With that said, I love this movie. Let me bring you back to the Sorcerer's Stone and Chamber of Secrets. These are very good interpretations of books. They have the important elements of the story and also many of the sub plots that have endeared millions of readers to the story. However, they were not the best MOVIES ever made. They didn't merit any Academy Awards for anything but Special Effects, and even those weren't as good as the Lord of the Rings movies. Being such a great fan of Harry Potter, I wanted the movies to do really well. Now I have realized that the only way for the movies to do well is if they are good MOVIES. Good movies make some sacrifices for the sake of time and overall effect. The beautiful words JK Rowling uses cannot possibly be incorporated into a two hour movie. This is why I believe that the books and movies ought to be treated as two separate genres. Then came movie three. Sure, it wasn't the best interpretation of a movie ever made. It left out many subplots, added some things, and changed some things. But it was definetly a good movie! This story is one of the most poignant in the Harry Potter series and the way Cuaron combined the mystery and darkness in this movie was very impressive. The effects were beautiful and deserved the Oscar. Dementors honestly send a chill through your bones and the Buckbeak really looks like the gentle beast he is. Everything flows so nicely. You can tell that the first things are being set into place for the plot of the series, the fight between Voldemort and Harry. The acting has raised in caliber. Rupert is still the best of the trio and he is such a funny character that lightens up some of the darker situations. Emma really brings out some of Hermione's spunk in this movie. Daniel on the other hand was pushed much more than either of his co-stars and he accomplished most of it very well. Sure, the crying didn't consist of real tears but the end was very emotional. The biggest complaint I've heard was the lack of the explanation of Moony, Wormtail, Padfoot, and Prongs. I'd like to add that if someone hadn't read the books and didn't figure out who Moony, Wormtail, Padfoot, and Prongs were, then you need your logic skills rechecked because it was indirectly stated SEVERAL times. So to recap, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban might not be the best interpretation of JK Rowling's grand novel, but it truly is a beautiful movie that ought to be treated separetly from the books. Go Cuaron! |  |  |  |  | | | |  |  |  |  | Four stars / 2005-12-17
Watching this movie after I read Order of the Phoenix made me get all teary-eyed during Sirius's parts, the dialogue between him and Harry was so perfect. It showed his character so well, like when he and Harry are looking up at Hogwarts and Sirius puts his arm around Harry -- perfect, he looked just like he should, loving and protective -- and also just after Harry and Hermione rescue Sirius, and he's talking to Harry, about to go off on Buckbeak...Maybe it wouldn't be so touching if OOTP's ending had been different, but I'm not sure. It was really well done. I was irritated with some of the changes, like Ron's drastic change from brave self-sacrifice (Sorcerer's Stone) to comic-relief joker ("He's got a point you know" -- UGGGHHHH)and Hermione's WAY too girl-power attitude - I mean, yes, Malfoy deserved the punch, but "Is that really what my hair looks like from the back?" is not at all Hermione and seemed just a ploy for laughs. And don't get me started on the knight Bus scene. So, taking a star off for the previously mentioned problems, this really was a good movie. Not great, but it was good. P.S. I'm not a 'kid', per se, (according to Amazon). I'm thirteen. I just don't know how to do the other kind of reviews. |  |  |  |  | | | |  |  |  |  | Harry Potter 3 is greatly dissapointing / 2005-12-12
I went to see Harry Potter 3 thinking this is going to be the best movie ever. I was wrong. The director sucks! He left out all the important details of the third movie. and don't even get me started about quiditch. AND THEY HAVE A COMPLETLY DIFFRENT SET! HELLO! DO THEY THINK WE ARE MENTAL?! The new set is to stupid to be in the movie. The movie was good but dissapionting |  |  |  |  | | | |  |  |  |  | DVD missing scenes!!! / 2005-12-11
I am most distressed to find that the "Widescreen Special Edition" DVD I purchased is missing numerous small scenes-scenes that are integral to understanding the story!! I have also noticed missing scenes in the Sorceror's Stone and the Chamber of Secrets, which are "Special Editions" as well. I, for one, will purchase no more Harry Potter DVD's until this practice stops. I am quite disgusted with the Harry Potter marketers and producers--I feel that I have been cheated out of my money. When JK Rowling et al. begin selling unabridged products, I will consider purchasing her movies again. The movies themselves are good; the DVD's are an outright rip-off. BUYER BEWARE!!! Disappointed fan |  |  |  |  | | | | | |